SRTR rankings · Kidney-Pancreas · November 2025 cohort

Kidney-Pancreas transplant centers by 1-year survival

106 kidney-pancreas programs meet SRTR's minimum case-volume floor in the November 2025 cohort. Rankings order risk-adjusted 1-year graft survival, not a recommendation to choose a center.

Full ranking table ↓ Compare centers

This data is for informational purposes only. It is not medical advice. Always consult your transplant team for decisions about your care. Rankings show centers by highest survival rate and do not constitute a recommendation.

According to SRTR Program-Specific Reports (November 2025), 106 kidney-pancreas programs meet the published case-volume floor and average 94.0% risk-adjusted 1-year graft survival; Allegheny General Hospital leads at 100.0%.

Survival is not volume

Allegheny General Hospital in Pennsylvania leads risk-adjusted 1-year graft survival at 100.0% (#1 of 106) but ranks #98 by program volume on 8 transplants (thin SRTR sample); Medical University of South Car… in South Carolina leads volume at 134 (#1 of 106) with 93.9% survival (rank #68).

100.0%
Allegheny General Hospital survival #1: #98
Allegheny General Hospital volume rank: 134
Medical University of South Car… transplants #1: #68
Medical University of South Car… survival rank

SRTR risk-adjusted 1-year graft survival and transplant counts come from Program-Specific Reports (November 2025). Higher survival is not a referral recommendation; high-volume programs accept broader candidate pools.

Kidney-Pancreas ranking picture

the ranked set performed 4,105 kidney-pancreas transplants combined; 2,182 candidates sit on these programs' combined waitlists.

106
Programs ranked: 94.0%
Mean 1-yr survival: 2,182
Combined waitlist

Survival rates are SRTR risk-adjusted estimates for historical cohorts. Centers accepting higher-risk patients may report lower rates while providing appropriate care.

Compiled by PlainTransplant · August 14, 2026

What to do with this

Use the ranked board to shortlist programs, then open a center page for the full SRTR extract.

Browse every indexed transplant center. All centers
Compare two centers side by side. Compare centers
See how survival rates are measured. Survival rates guide

Rankings reprint SRTR survival and volume fields for educational reference; they are not a referral ranking.

Every figure on PlainTransplant is rendered directly from SRTR Program-Specific Reports data, no number is typed in by an editor. Organ rankings for Kidney-Pancreas are ordered from SRTR Program-Specific Reports risk-adjusted 1-year graft survival; no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a correction. Data current as of November 2025.

Centers with highest 1-year graft survival rate from SRTR November 2025, limited to programs reporting at least 5 kidney-pancreas transplants in the period (below that, a single case can swing the rate by 20+ points). 106 centers meet that floor.

Note: Survival rate alone does not determine the best center for your situation. Centers that accept higher-risk patients or sicker patients may have lower survival rates. Discuss your options with your transplant team.

Mean 1-year graft survival across 106 ranked kidney-pancreas programs in the November 2025 SRTR cohort

What this shows: the bar behind each 1-yr Survival figure is scaled to Allegheny General Hospital's rate (100.0%), the highest in this cohort. Hover a row for that center's exact share of the leader and its rank out of 106.

Rank	Center	State	1-yr Survival	3-yr Survival	Transplants	Waitlist stock	Additions
1	Allegheny General Hospital	Pennsylvania	100.0%	50.0%	8	1	0
2	Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center	Wisconsin	100.0%	66.7%	8	10	9
3	Banner-University Medical Center Phoenix	Arizona	100.0%	75.0%	7	7	5
4	Barnes-Jewish Hospital	Missouri	100.0%	100.0%	57	32	13
5	Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical Center-Fort Worth	Texas	100.0%	87.5%	54	10	11
6	Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center	Massachusetts	100.0%	100.0%	33	28	17
7	Brigham and Women's Hospital	Massachusetts	100.0%	100.0%	7	12	8
8	Carolinas Medical Center	North Carolina	100.0%	100.0%	31	26	18
9	Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital	Wisconsin	100.0%	100.0%	30	27	21
10	Hackensack University Medical Center	New Jersey	100.0%	N/A	13	12	14
11	Henry Ford Hospital	Michigan	100.0%	100.0%	15	11	3
12	Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	100.0%	91.3%	86	53	33
13	Houston Methodist Hospital	Texas	100.0%	90.0%	58	35	26
14	Indiana University Health	Indiana	100.0%	94.3%	75	28	30
15	Integris Baptist Medical Center	Oklahoma	100.0%	100.0%	16	6	6
16	Intermountain Medical Center	Utah	100.0%	92.3%	20	5	7
17	Keck Hospital of USC	California	100.0%	80.0%	14	14	10
18	Lehigh Valley Hospital	Pennsylvania	100.0%	66.7%	15	9	11
19	Loyola University Medical Center	Illinois	100.0%	92.9%	45	15	11
20	Massachusetts General Hospital	Massachusetts	100.0%	100.0%	18	5	5
21	Mayo Clinic Hospital	Arizona	100.0%	100.0%	77	27	37
22	Medical City Dallas Hospital	Texas	100.0%	100.0%	42	14	22
23	Memorial Hermann Hospital, University of Texas at Houston	Texas	100.0%	100.0%	17	8	4
24	New York University Medical Center	New York	100.0%	85.0%	41	13	6
25	New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center	New York	100.0%	91.7%	26	16	6
26	OSF Saint Francis Medical Center	Illinois	100.0%	100.0%	13	2	2
27	Presbyterian Hospital	New Mexico	100.0%	100.0%	7	12	2
28	Research Medical Center	Missouri	100.0%	50.0%	6	4	2
29	Riverside Community Hospital	California	100.0%	100.0%	10	0	0
30	Rush University Medical Center	Illinois	100.0%	94.1%	27	20	12
31	Scripps Green Hospital	California	100.0%	100.0%	16	11	5
32	Sharp Memorial Hospital	California	100.0%	100.0%	13	15	2
33	SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital	Missouri	100.0%	100.0%	10	12	5
34	Stanford Health Care	California	100.0%	75.0%	7	4	1
35	Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center	New York	100.0%	N/A	7	10	10
36	Swedish Medical Center	Washington	100.0%	100.0%	16	4	2
37	Tampa General Hospital	Florida	100.0%	95.0%	46	13	15
38	The Cleveland Clinic Foundation	Ohio	100.0%	93.8%	31	18	14
39	Tulane Medical Center	Louisiana	100.0%	87.5%	37	19	11
40	UF Health Shands Hospital	Florida	100.0%	100.0%	23	11	11
41	University Hospitals of Cleveland	Ohio	100.0%	100.0%	15	13	12
42	University of Alabama Hospital	Alabama	100.0%	93.8%	39	22	10
43	University of Cincinnati Medical Center	Ohio	100.0%	100.0%	66	22	15
44	University of Colorado Hospital/Health Science Center	Colorado	100.0%	100.0%	35	16	7
45	University of Kentucky Medical Center	Kentucky	100.0%	100.0%	16	13	9
46	University of Michigan Medical Center	Michigan	100.0%	100.0%	27	18	10
47	University of Mississippi Medical Center	Mississippi	100.0%	100.0%	23	9	9
48	University of North Carolina Hospitals	North Carolina	100.0%	100.0%	13	10	6
49	University of Pittsburgh Medical Center	Pennsylvania	100.0%	100.0%	40	18	2
50	University of Utah Medical Center	Utah	100.0%	100.0%	28	20	16
51	University of Virginia Health Sciences Center	Virginia	100.0%	76.9%	41	25	13
52	University of Washington Medical Center	Washington	100.0%	92.3%	25	13	7
53	Vidant Medical Center	North Carolina	100.0%	88.1%	57	24	6
54	Virginia Mason Medical Center	Washington	100.0%	100.0%	12	10	4
55	Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center	North Carolina	100.0%	94.1%	81	30	25
56	Northwestern Memorial Hospital	Illinois	98.2%	87.0%	88	48	46
57	University of Chicago Medical Center	Illinois	97.1%	94.7%	33	19	23
58	Jackson Memorial Hospital University of Miami School of Medicine	Florida	96.8%	85.3%	70	25	31
59	Duke University Hospital	North Carolina	96.6%	78.9%	43	13	19
60	University of Maryland Medical System	Maryland	96.3%	87.9%	74	30	21
61	California Pacific Medical Center	California	96.2%	92.1%	48	15	14
62	Emory University Hospital	Georgia	95.7%	90.9%	47	12	18
63	University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics	Wisconsin	95.2%	93.8%	78	23	27
64	Florida Hospital Medical Center	Florida	95.0%	94.7%	37	3	6
65	Oregon Health & Science University	Oregon	95.0%	84.6%	36	17	10
66	University of California San Francisco Medical Center	California	95.0%	96.4%	105	112	51
67	Loma Linda University Medical Center	California	94.0%	90.2%	81	116	98
68	Medical University of South Carolina	South Carolina	93.9%	88.5%	134	96	72
69	Johns Hopkins Hospital	Maryland	93.8%	83.3%	36	13	9
70	Methodist University Hospital	Tennessee	93.8%	81.0%	38	29	22
71	Auxilio Mutuo Hospital	Puerto Rico	93.5%	100.0%	30	17	24
72	Methodist Specialty and Transplant Hospital	Texas	93.3%	60.0%	30	2	5
73	Georgetown University Medical Center	District of Columbia	93.3%	74.7%	100	13	27
74	Baylor University Medical Center	Texas	93.1%	93.8%	57	12	13
75	Banner University Medical Center-Tucson	Arizona	92.9%	85.7%	14	8	9
76	Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center	New Jersey	92.9%	80.0%	25	12	5
77	Vanderbilt University Medical Center	Tennessee	92.9%	92.9%	36	16	6
78	Piedmont Hospital	Georgia	92.6%	91.2%	58	15	21
79	Inova Fairfax Hospital	Virginia	92.3%	100.0%	15	14	19
80	University of Minnesota Medical Center, Fairview	Minnesota	92.3%	86.7%	127	146	64
81	Mount Sinai Medical Center	New York	91.7%	78.8%	31	34	21
82	Ochsner Foundation Hospital	Louisiana	91.7%	80.8%	54	28	19
83	Willis-Knighton Medical Center	Louisiana	91.7%	80.5%	60	17	18
84	University of Illinois Medical Center	Illinois	91.5%	80.7%	92	25	47
85	Ohio State University Medical Center	Ohio	91.4%	88.5%	60	12	11
86	Saint Barnabas Medical Center	New Jersey	90.9%	66.7%	20	15	11
87	Rochester Methodist Hospital (Mayo Clinic)	Minnesota	90.0%	92.3%	66	30	21
88	Methodist Dallas Medical Center	Texas	88.9%	100.0%	21	7	6
89	University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Transplant Programs	Iowa	88.9%	88.5%	58	23	13
90	Erie County Medical Center	New York	88.7%	75.0%	34	7	4
91	Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital	New Jersey	88.5%	81.7%	52	26	18
92	Jewish Hospital	Kentucky	87.5%	90.0%	19	14	9
93	NY Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia Univ. Medical Center	New York	87.5%	94.1%	43	24	10
94	Thomas Jefferson University Hospital	Pennsylvania	87.5%	100.0%	25	22	10
95	University of California Irvine Medical Center	California	87.5%	100.0%	15	12	8
96	University of Kansas Hospital	Kansas	87.5%	88.2%	34	16	11
97	Medical College of Virginia Hospitals	Virginia	87.2%	94.1%	35	31	25
98	OU Medical Center	Oklahoma	85.7%	100.0%	9	5	4
99	Scott and White Memorial Hospital	Texas	85.7%	82.8%	43	4	3
100	Cedars-Sinai Medical Center	California	83.3%	95.0%	36	29	14
101	Mayo Clinic Florida	Florida	83.3%	90.9%	64	34	21
102	Montefiore Medical Center	New York	76.7%	86.8%	121	12	12
103	Albert Einstein Medical Center	Pennsylvania	66.7%	100.0%	21	21	10
104	Temple University Hospital	Pennsylvania	53.3%	50.0%	32	22	4
105	Avera McKennan Hospital	South Dakota	50.0%	100.0%	12	28	24
106	Sentara Norfolk General Hospital	Virginia	0.0%	66.7%	8	16	8

Featured Kidney-Pancreas Programs

A quick-scan card view of top kidney-pancreas transplant programs. Use the full ranking table above for complete comparisons.

Allegheny General Hospital

Pennsylvania · Rank #1 · 100.0% 1-yr

Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center

Wisconsin · Rank #2 · 100.0% 1-yr

Banner-University Medical Center Phoenix

Arizona · Rank #3 · 100.0% 1-yr

Barnes-Jewish Hospital

Missouri · Rank #4 · 100.0% 1-yr

Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical Center-Fort Worth

Texas · Rank #5 · 100.0% 1-yr

Compare Kidney-Pancreas centers side-by-side →Kidney-Pancreas overview

How to Read This Ranking

Survival rankings for kidney-pancreas transplantation reflect a single, well-defined outcome: the probability that the transplanted organ remains functional one year after surgery, adjusted for differences in patient mix. Two centers reporting the same raw survival number can sit very far apart in a risk-adjusted ranking when one accepts a much sicker waiting list than the other. SRTR's hierarchical Bayesian models lean toward the national average for low-volume centers, so a small program with five transplants in the cohort window will move less in either direction than a large program with five hundred, the ranking is most stable for centers in the middle of the volume distribution.

Risk adjustment matters because not every kidney-pancreas candidate carries the same baseline risk. Recipients with advanced disease, multiple prior failed transplants, donor-recipient size mismatches, or immunological sensitization will have lower expected survival before the procedure begins. SRTR's models subtract this expected survival from observed survival to produce a center-specific performance estimate. A center that consistently accepts the most complex referrals, for instance, regional referral hospitals taking patients other programs decline, can outperform on risk-adjusted survival while reporting lower raw numbers. The ranking column you see here is the adjusted figure, not the raw one.

Patients and referring clinicians use these rankings as one signal among several. Distance from home, insurance coverage, surgeon volume in your specific subtype, willingness to accept marginal donors, and program-specific eligibility criteria all weigh into a real-world transplant decision. The rankings here describe the typical outcome envelope a program has produced in the SRTR cohort window, they do not, and cannot, predict your individual outcome. Always discuss center selection with your transplant nephrologist, hepatologist, cardiologist, or pulmonologist, who can correlate published survival data with your specific clinical profile.

Caveats and Limitations

SRTR Program-Specific Reports are released semi-annually (May and November). Rankings shown here reflect the most recent published cohort; some single-event changes at a program may not yet be visible.
Programs below SRTR's minimum case-volume threshold are excluded from comparative rankings to preserve statistical reliability. Such programs may still be active and may report individual outcomes elsewhere.
One-year graft survival is the SRTR's primary public outcome but not the only metric that matters. Patient survival, three-year graft survival, time to transplant from listing, and post-transplant readmission rates each tell a different story about program performance.
Geographic concentration of transplant centers means a top-ranked program may be impractical for patients in rural or under-served regions. The Compare and State views allow filtering by geography to surface programs that are realistic options for a specific patient.

Data Sources

SRTR Program-Specific Reports (November 2025 release) - risk-adjusted 1-year graft survival estimates for kidney-pancreas transplant programs. srtr.org
OPTN kidney-pancreas allocation policy - policy governing kidney-pancreas distribution nationally. optn.transplant.hrsa.gov

About These Rankings

Source: SRTR Program-Specific Reports, November 2025 Centers are ranked by estimated 1-year graft survival probability for adult recipients. Centers without sufficient case volume are excluded per SRTR statistical methodology

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.