SRTR rankings · Liver · November 2025 cohort

Liver transplant centers by 1-year survival

119 liver programs meet SRTR's minimum case-volume floor in the November 2025 cohort. Rankings order risk-adjusted 1-year graft survival, not a recommendation to choose a center.

This data is for informational purposes only. It is not medical advice. Always consult your transplant team for decisions about your care. Rankings show centers by highest survival rate and do not constitute a recommendation.

According to SRTR Program-Specific Reports (November 2025), 119 liver programs meet the published case-volume floor and average 91.5% risk-adjusted 1-year graft survival; Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center leads at 100.0%.

Survival is not volume

Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center in Wisconsin leads risk-adjusted 1-year graft survival at 100.0% (#1 of 119) but ranks #87 by program volume at 154 transplants; University of California at Los… in California leads volume at 1,059 (#1 of 119) with 92.7% survival (rank #61).

100.0%
Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center survival #1
#87
Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center volume rank
1,059
University of California at Los… transplants #1
#61
University of California at Los… survival rank

SRTR risk-adjusted 1-year graft survival and transplant counts come from Program-Specific Reports (November 2025). Higher survival is not a referral recommendation; high-volume programs accept broader candidate pools.

Liver ranking picture

the ranked set performed 38,557 liver transplants combined; 9,398 candidates sit on these programs' combined waitlists.

119
Programs ranked
91.5%
Mean 1-yr survival
9,398
Combined waitlist

Survival rates are SRTR risk-adjusted estimates for historical cohorts. Centers accepting higher-risk patients may report lower rates while providing appropriate care.

What to do with this

Use the ranked board to shortlist programs, then open a center page for the full SRTR extract.

Rankings reprint SRTR survival and volume fields for educational reference; they are not a referral ranking.

Every figure on PlainTransplant is rendered directly from SRTR Program-Specific Reports data, no number is typed in by an editor. Organ rankings for Liver are ordered from SRTR Program-Specific Reports risk-adjusted 1-year graft survival; no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a correction. Data current as of November 2025.

Centers with highest 1-year graft survival rate from SRTR November 2025, limited to programs reporting at least 5 liver transplants in the period (below that, a single case can swing the rate by 20+ points). 119 centers meet that floor.

Note: Survival rate alone does not determine the best center for your situation. Centers that accept higher-risk patients or sicker patients may have lower survival rates. Discuss your options with your transplant team.

Top 10 liver programs by 1-year graft survival

Risk-adjusted SRTR estimates for programs meeting the minimum case-volume floor. Higher bar = higher reported survival in this cohort.

Survival ranking
1. Aurora St. Luke's Medical…100%2. Centura Porter Adventist…100%3. Children's Healthcare of…100%4. Michael E. DeBakey VA Med…100%5. Texas Children's Hospital100%6. UPMC Children's Hospital…100%7. VA Portland Health Care S…100%8. Froedtert Memorial Luther…99%9. Cleveland Clinic Florida…98.4%10. The Queen's Medical Cent…98%
0%100%91.5%
Mean 1-year graft survival across 119 ranked liver programs in the November 2025 SRTR cohort

What this shows: the bar behind each 1-yr Survival figure is scaled to Aurora St. Luke's Medical C…'s rate (100.0%), the highest in this cohort. Hover a row for that center's exact share of the leader and its rank out of 119.

RankCenterState1-yr Survival3-yr SurvivalTransplantsWaitlist stockAdditions
1Aurora St. Luke's Medical CenterWisconsin
100.0%
78.5%1542736
2Centura Porter Adventist HospitalColorado
100.0%
80.0%52712
3Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at EglestonGeorgia
100.0%
100.0%7676
4Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical CenterTexas
100.0%
92.3%924141
5Texas Children's HospitalTexas
100.0%
0.0%1371433
6UPMC Children's Hospital of PittsburghPennsylvania
100.0%
100.0%652243
7VA Portland Health Care SystemOregon
100.0%
78.4%821624
8Froedtert Memorial Lutheran HospitalWisconsin
99.0%
85.8%2795986
9Cleveland Clinic Florida WestonFlorida
98.4%
84.9%19259106
10The Queen's Medical CenterHawaii
98.0%
85.6%682835
11UF Health Shands HospitalFlorida
97.8%
91.0%35444180
12University Hospitals of ClevelandOhio
97.6%
94.1%1713649
13UT Southwestern Medical Center/Texas
97.5%
87.5%531220197
14Westchester Medical CenterNew York
96.5%
85.3%2794977
15University of Minnesota Medical Center, FairviewMinnesota
96.3%
92.6%36452138
16Intermountain Medical CenterUtah
96.3%
89.4%32025175
17University Hospital, University of Texas Health Science CenterTexas
96.1%
92.9%372182281
18Willis-Knighton Medical CenterLouisiana
96.0%
59.2%673715
19Banner-University Medical Center PhoenixArizona
95.8%
76.5%2951370
20New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical CenterNew York
95.8%
86.8%22587117
21William Beaumont HospitalMichigan
95.5%
95.5%1484152
22Indiana University HealthIndiana
95.3%
86.1%55199231
23UAMS Medical CenterArkansas
95.3%
86.0%1602361
24New York University Medical CenterNew York
95.2%
90.1%18939141
25North Shore University Hospital/Northwell HealthNew York
95.2%
92.1%11358153
26Methodist Specialty and Transplant HospitalTexas
95.2%
83.7%4548396
27Memorial Hermann Hospital, University of Texas at HoustonTexas
95.1%
85.8%1523028
28Yale New Haven HospitalConnecticut
94.8%
83.1%16510065
29University of California San Diego Medical CenterCalifornia
94.7%
87.7%35468174
30University of Virginia Health Sciences CenterVirginia
94.7%
86.0%3212894
31Keck Hospital of USCCalifornia
94.7%
86.5%620219218
32University of Washington Medical CenterWashington
94.5%
93.4%42687154
33Geisinger Medical CenterPennsylvania
94.4%
90.5%623233
34University of Kentucky Medical CenterKentucky
94.4%
90.4%313118117
35Piedmont HospitalGeorgia
94.3%
88.4%566146230
36Florida Hospital Medical CenterFlorida
94.3%
83.4%2583674
37Montefiore Medical CenterNew York
94.3%
81.0%1932056
38Duke University HospitalNorth Carolina
94.3%
87.0%36138202
39Hospital of the University of PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
94.2%
86.2%545163233
40Auxilio Mutuo HospitalPuerto Rico
93.9%
89.8%1521739
41VA Pittsburgh Healthcare SystemPennsylvania
93.9%
74.6%1444540
42Mayo Clinic HospitalArizona
93.9%
86.2%757101390
43Stanford Health CareCalifornia
93.7%
85.4%473138170
44Loma Linda University Medical CenterCalifornia
93.5%
83.9%48372123
45Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon
93.5%
95.8%26979127
46Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterMassachusetts
93.5%
84.1%29116106
47Rochester Methodist Hospital (Mayo Clinic)Minnesota
93.4%
90.5%498101194
48Ochsner Foundation HospitalLouisiana
93.3%
84.8%57777160
49Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical CenterNew York
93.3%
85.3%31561106
50Integris Baptist Medical CenterOklahoma
93.2%
83.7%31399130
51Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia
93.1%
84.9%43871150
52California Pacific Medical CenterCalifornia
93.0%
88.3%3379397
53CHI St. Luke's Health Baylor College of Medicine Medical CenterTexas
92.9%
88.0%531212210
54Loyola University Medical CenterIllinois
92.9%
85.1%25947100
55Henry Ford HospitalMichigan
92.9%
86.1%392119160
56Methodist Dallas Medical CenterTexas
92.9%
87.0%31075109
57Allegheny General HospitalPennsylvania
92.8%
82.0%1572778
58Medical University of South CarolinaSouth Carolina
92.8%
80.9%329109128
59Northwestern Memorial HospitalIllinois
92.7%
82.4%36768163
60Tampa General HospitalFlorida
92.7%
85.3%607140363
61University of California at Los Angeles Medical CenterCalifornia
92.7%
85.9%1,059490385
62Carolinas Medical CenterNorth Carolina
92.6%
88.4%29735119
63University of Illinois Medical CenterIllinois
92.6%
80.8%2113180
64Mayo Clinic FloridaFlorida
92.5%
88.4%52297226
65University of California San Francisco Medical CenterCalifornia
92.5%
91.4%778414263
66Barnes-Jewish HospitalMissouri
92.3%
81.4%47662177
67University of Cincinnati Medical CenterOhio
92.3%
85.6%89216170
68Rush University Medical CenterIllinois
92.0%
88.5%1603996
69Johns Hopkins HospitalMaryland
91.9%
90.0%509290201
70Vanderbilt University Medical CenterTennessee
91.9%
85.2%605134232
71St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical CenterArizona
91.9%
81.1%991620
72University of Colorado Hospital/Health Science CenterColorado
91.8%
86.2%37495188
73Tulane Medical CenterLouisiana
91.7%
87.4%72717
74Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical CenterPennsylvania
91.7%
79.2%130635
75University of Alabama HospitalAlabama
91.7%
86.5%463140181
76University HospitalNew Jersey
91.6%
92.3%2446783
77Swedish Medical CenterWashington
91.6%
82.1%19149108
78OU Medical CenterOklahoma
91.6%
87.5%115949
79SSM Health Saint Louis University HospitalMissouri
91.5%
93.2%1525071
80The Nebraska Medical CenterNebraska
91.4%
87.8%39282183
81Albert Einstein Medical CenterPennsylvania
91.3%
78.6%32342109
82University of Michigan Medical CenterMichigan
91.3%
86.7%27842155
83University of Maryland Medical SystemMaryland
91.2%
84.3%439175128
84St Luke's Hospital of Kansas CityMissouri
91.1%
82.4%1142728
85University of North Carolina HospitalsNorth Carolina
91.0%
88.9%1513255
86Baylor University Medical CenterTexas
91.0%
82.9%42832111
87Mount Sinai Medical CenterNew York
91.0%
82.9%729104238
88UMass Memorial Medical CenterMassachusetts
90.8%
83.0%43022289
89University of Wisconsin Hospital and ClinicsWisconsin
90.6%
85.3%40190168
90The Cleveland Clinic FoundationOhio
90.5%
83.5%63368258
91Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical Center-Fort WorthTexas
90.5%
86.7%3932072
92Hartford HospitalConnecticut
90.4%
88.1%1466961
93Ohio State University Medical CenterOhio
90.1%
87.1%57589227
94Massachusetts General HospitalMassachusetts
90.0%
85.9%578172114
95Presbyterian/St Luke's Medical CenterColorado
89.9%
84.1%2204760
96University of Kansas HospitalKansas
89.8%
84.3%290140127
97Emory University HospitalGeorgia
89.7%
85.8%49470152
98NY Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia Univ. Medical CenterNew York
89.6%
87.3%35198155
99Largo Medical CenterFlorida
89.6%
84.7%741246
100Houston Methodist HospitalTexas
89.3%
80.8%1,007377396
101University of Chicago Medical CenterIllinois
89.2%
83.5%26159139
102University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPennsylvania
89.0%
84.6%33194173
103University of Utah Medical CenterUtah
89.0%
89.7%1613678
104Jackson Memorial Hospital University of Miami School of MedicineFlorida
88.9%
84.7%636113198
105Banner University Medical Center-TucsonArizona
88.0%
68.4%511314
106Georgetown University Medical CenterDistrict of Columbia
87.9%
82.6%516212201
107Thomas Jefferson University HospitalPennsylvania
87.7%
85.2%361101105
108Medical College of Virginia HospitalsVirginia
87.6%
88.0%584213290
109Methodist University HospitalTennessee
87.0%
81.6%41938103
110Lahey Clinic Medical CenterMassachusetts
86.6%
85.6%26973136
111Our Lady of Lourdes Medical CenterNew Jersey
84.4%
87.2%1322962
112Jewish HospitalKentucky
81.0%
84.0%981022
113University of Mississippi Medical CenterMississippi
80.0%
87.9%1813774
114Temple University HospitalPennsylvania
78.6%
79.4%731218
115Scripps Green HospitalCalifornia
77.2%
84.4%1484142
116University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Transplant ProgramsIowa
71.4%
89.7%1442033
117Avera McKennan HospitalSouth Dakota
66.7%
61.9%9000
118Broward Health Medical CenterFlorida
50.0%
77.5%6600
119Childrens Hospital Los AngelesCalifornia
50.0%
N/A1162026

A quick-scan card view of top liver transplant programs. Use the full ranking table above for complete comparisons.

How to Read This Ranking

Survival rankings for liver transplantation reflect a single, well-defined outcome: the probability that the transplanted organ remains functional one year after surgery, adjusted for differences in patient mix. Two centers reporting the same raw survival number can sit very far apart in a risk-adjusted ranking when one accepts a much sicker waiting list than the other. SRTR's hierarchical Bayesian models lean toward the national average for low-volume centers, so a small program with five transplants in the cohort window will move less in either direction than a large program with five hundred, the ranking is most stable for centers in the middle of the volume distribution.

Risk adjustment matters because not every liver candidate carries the same baseline risk. Recipients with advanced disease, multiple prior failed transplants, donor-recipient size mismatches, or immunological sensitization will have lower expected survival before the procedure begins. SRTR's models subtract this expected survival from observed survival to produce a center-specific performance estimate. A center that consistently accepts the most complex referrals, for instance, regional referral hospitals taking patients other programs decline, can outperform on risk-adjusted survival while reporting lower raw numbers. The ranking column you see here is the adjusted figure, not the raw one.

Patients and referring clinicians use these rankings as one signal among several. Distance from home, insurance coverage, surgeon volume in your specific subtype, willingness to accept marginal donors, and program-specific eligibility criteria all weigh into a real-world transplant decision. The rankings here describe the typical outcome envelope a program has produced in the SRTR cohort window, they do not, and cannot, predict your individual outcome. Always discuss center selection with your transplant nephrologist, hepatologist, cardiologist, or pulmonologist, who can correlate published survival data with your specific clinical profile.

Caveats and Limitations

  • SRTR Program-Specific Reports are released semi-annually (May and November). Rankings shown here reflect the most recent published cohort; some single-event changes at a program may not yet be visible.
  • Programs below SRTR's minimum case-volume threshold are excluded from comparative rankings to preserve statistical reliability. Such programs may still be active and may report individual outcomes elsewhere.
  • One-year graft survival is the SRTR's primary public outcome but not the only metric that matters. Patient survival, three-year graft survival, time to transplant from listing, and post-transplant readmission rates each tell a different story about program performance.
  • Geographic concentration of transplant centers means a top-ranked program may be impractical for patients in rural or under-served regions. The Compare and State views allow filtering by geography to surface programs that are realistic options for a specific patient.

Data Sources

  • SRTR Program-Specific Reports (November 2025 release) - risk-adjusted 1-year graft survival estimates for liver transplant programs. srtr.org
  • OPTN liver allocation policy - policy governing liver distribution nationally. optn.transplant.hrsa.gov

About These Rankings

This data is for informational purposes only. It is not medical advice. Always consult your transplant team for decisions about your care. Rankings show centers by highest survival rate and do not constitute a recommendation.

Source: SRTR Program-Specific Reports, November 2025 Centers are ranked by estimated 1-year graft survival probability for adult recipients. Centers without sufficient case volume are excluded per SRTR statistical methodology